3 ms·

For sure, I agree with that. How does that link back to having exceptions allowing law enforcement to use tear gas on civilians though?

• lazide 2y ago
  Because civilians don’t have WMD style chemical weapons, generally? So are not an ‘MAD’ type risk. Unlike potential enemy combatants. Morality has nothing to do with these scenarios (treaty/convention wise) near as I can tell.
  • _heimdall 2y ago
    It seems like you would agree then that the use of force should be acceptable as long as you know its asymmetric. Am I misreading you there?
    • lazide 2y ago
      Clearly yes, you are misreading me. If governments consider it acceptable or not has nothing to do with my opinion. Or yours.