4 ms·
Thanks for publishing this. Can you also share your opinion if you compare the "code to spec" vs "spec to code" phases? I'm wondering if the LLM considers "co
by hakaneskici 2y ago
Thanks for publishing this.
Can you also share your opinion if you compare the "code to spec" vs "spec to code" phases?
I'm wondering if the LLM considers "code" and "spec" as two separate programming languages, or one as a programming, and the other as a human language? Not sure if it makes a difference or not for its internal translation logic though, if that makes sense.
PS: I learned BASIC on a friend's ZX Spectrum, and your post made me remember some forgotten childhood memories :) Extra thanks.
- ghuntley 2y ago> I'm wondering if the LLM considers "code" and "spec" as two separate programming languages, or one as a programming, and the other as a human language? Not sure if it makes a difference or not for its internal translation logic though, if that makes sense. It would have been possible to go direct from intel asm to z80 asm without /specs. > and the other as a human language There's some research here from a couple years ago over at https://githubnext.com/projects/speclang/ https://githubnext.com/projects/speclang/ which is all about /specs as the source of truth for creating an app.