4 ms·
But quantum physics can't predict exactly where the individual dots on the detector will be, only their distribution. That does not sound totally quantitative a
by rini17 2y ago
But quantum physics can't predict exactly where the individual dots on the detector will be, only their distribution. That does not sound totally quantitative and precise and defined. You would not accept such predictions for macroscopic objects :)
- GoblinSlayer 2y agoIt can't do it, because you want it to make a classical prediction. It shouldn't be able to predict what doesn't happen.
- rini17 2y agoI want any theory to predict what actually happens, which is individual dots at detector. Or at least some clear statement how comes our reality is not like that.
- tadfisher 2y agoWould you be satisfied if the theory clearly states: "At the time of measurement, the position of the photon interaction is determined by randomly sampling from the quantum distribution"?
- rini17 2y agoEinstein was not satisfied afaik. Plus by this you're proving we haven't moved on since, which isn't very satisfying either.
- GoblinSlayer 2y agoAt least it shouldn't be nonlocal just because of the erroneous rumor that Bell proved that quantum physics is nonlocal or because randomness, nonlocality and retrocausality are just directly observed.