3 ms·

The operator deserves to be killed for this. Stop defending evil

• mmooss 2y ago
  > The operator who? > for this for what? > deserves to be killed Who are you to say? What if someone else disagrees, as they likely do? Should any one person have the authority to kill another? Maybe that's why someone is attacking you (in the hypothetical scenario).
  • asdf6969 2y ago
    Every reasonable person agrees with me. It’s obvious. Would you ever write a unit test to assert true is true? Sometimes you can just look at the problem and the right answer is so clear that everyone knows it
    • mmooss 2y ago
      > Every reasonable person agrees with me. It's exactly the opposite - you're spending too much time in the violent-ideology bubble. Most of the world is law-abiding, avoids violence, and calls the police. Until recently in the US it was almost universal, afaik, that self-defense was the limit of legal violence, and you had a 'duty to retreat' if violence could be avoided. Only recently has the right wing passed 'castle doctrine' laws there. In other countries, people don't buy guns with the idea of meeting violence with violence; in the US, at least until recently, most people didn't have guns.
      • impossiblefork 2y ago
        But there is already violence, since people turned on this device.
        • mmooss 2y ago
          What device? I didn't say violence didn't exist; I said the vast majority of people are opposed to it as a solution to problems.