3 ms·
It's certainly a violation of the rental terms.
by KeplerBoy 2y ago
It's certainly a violation of the rental terms.
- HPsquared 2y agoIt's on page 52.
- randunel 2y agoActually, it's first implied on page 23, but it becomes clear in conjunction with the articles on pages 48 and 49. The article you're referring to on page 52 has provisions regarding confusion and/or impersonation, following the previously mentioned positive affirmation. You need the full context of the T&C's, don't cherry pick.
- nicce 2y agoRental terms were 1000 page book.
- blitzar 2y agoThat's the terms from when you rented the car, we have updated the terms since then.
- DeathArrow 2y agoI will feed the book into an LLM and ask questions.