3 ms·
I don't think so. If the authorities are willing to point something that permanently damages hearing at thousands of people in the name of "crowd control" or "p
by __MatrixMan__ 2y ago
I don't think so. If the authorities are willing to point something that permanently damages hearing at thousands of people in the name of "crowd control" or "protecting property" then they don't deserve to be the authorities anymore.
In the grand scheme of things, property just isn't that important.
Also, did you watch the video? They were just standing there.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> If the authorities are willing to point something that permanently damages hearing at thousands of people in the name of "crowd control" or "protecting property" then they don't deserve to be the authorities anymore There are absolutely riots where deploying such a weapon would be justified. On one hand, you have loss of hearing. On the other hand, you have the possibility of loss of life. It has to come from the perspective of protecting the people, including those who are rioting, which is a difficult judgement call to make in any case.