4 ms·
Entirely different software stack.
by iknowstuff 2y ago
Entirely different software stack.
- XorNot 2y agoLike I said, I get how this could happen. But it is wild for a company proposing they've "almost" solved FSD to not be able to execute basic collision avoidance - a core, fundamental capability of FSD - to not have deployed that capability into the hardware of a car they claim is completely capable of FSD with that hardware.
- iknowstuff 2y agoNo, collision avoidance has to put a greater degree of trust in the actual driver of the vehicle, the human, and only step in if it’s absolutely certain the human is about to hit something they did not intend to hit. For example, when Tesla detects that you are about to accelerate into a human or a wall, they slow down the acceleration so that you have time to react, but they don’t stop it altogether. That’s very different from FSD’s decision-making process.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Prickle 2y agoThat should also be entirely irrelevant. It's emergency breaking. There shouldn't be differing results on whether you paid an extra $8000 usd or not. FSD does not advertise better emergency breaking as a feature. (Last I checked anyway.)
- iknowstuff 2y agoThe title shouldn't say self driving car then should it. Most if not all vehicles for sale will plow right through a styrofoam wall like that regardless of whats painted on it.
- Prickle 2y agoNo car advertising lane keeping or emergency breaking, would punch through that wall. Regardless of whether it's a simple poster, or a Styrofoam wall. Because emergency breaking should just work, regardless of mode.
- iknowstuff 2y agoOh please do me a favor and run your car into a wall to prove me wrong