3 ms·
Yes, but I don't think you could argue the point that the visual sense is probably 95% of it. But even so, it could be decades before computers achieve the sens
by intrasight 2y ago
Yes, but I don't think you could argue the point that the visual sense is probably 95% of it. But even so, it could be decades before computers achieve the sensory capabilities of the human visual system. Why not, during those hundred years, add some lidar to the sensory mix. Just because it didn't evolve in humans doesn't mean it's not a good thing. Bats and dolphins use the biological analogue very effectively.
- iknowstuff 2y agoTheir cameras have better dynamic range than humans, not to mention the neural net can consume multiple exposures simultaneously. From surround video.
- vel0city 2y ago> Their cameras have better dynamic range than humans This is obviously untrue if you've ever watched videos from sentry mode.
- iknowstuff 2y agoSentry mode videos are sdr
- bcrl 2y agoVision isn't the only problem. Can computers do a decent job of theory-of-mind of other drivers? What about seeing a tire bouncing down off an overpass that's visible to the driver? Software developers love saying that it's the 95% that matters, but in safety critical systems, that simplification simply does not work.
- intrasight 2y ago> Software developers love saying that it's the 95% that matters Perhaps if they're early in their career. But any who have done challenging projects know that it's the last 5% that's the hardest and that often matters the most.