I don't think it's quite as quack of me to present as you might think: it has a somewhat fringe but not unsuccessful body of recent study. https://pubmed.ncbi.

I don't think it's quite as quack of me to present as you might think: it has a somewhat fringe but not unsuccessful body of recent study. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26989784/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26989784/ I tend to think (as some others do) that it's also a much better way to reason about quantum computation. Should a factorization of a large semiprime number by Shor's algorithm be attributed to the semi-mystical power of The Observer collapsing the wave function (which is who by the way, the sensor, or the person reading that sensor?), or are we instead exploiting realism to do the work?