There's two sides to this: > "as harsh as it may seem, I would say that they’re trying to work in a field that isn’t for them." I find this statement problema

There's two sides to this: > "as harsh as it may seem, I would say that they’re trying to work in a field that isn’t for them." I find this statement problematic for a different reason: we live in a world where minimum wages (if they exist) are lower than living wages & mean wages are significantly lower the point at which well-being indices plateau. In that context calling people out for working in a field that "isn't for them" is inutile - if you can get by in the field then leaving it simply isn't logical. THAT SAID, I do find the above comment incongruent with reality. If you're in a field that's "not for you" for economic reasons that's cool but making out that it is in fact for you, despite "tolerating" writing code, is a little different. > I got into the game for creativity Are you confusing creativity with productivity? If you're productive that's great; economic imperative, etc. I'm not knocking that as a positive basis. But nothing you describe in your comment would fall under the umbrella of what I consider "creativity".