3 ms·
There was, bluntly, a mountain of bullshit from many angles. When trying to keep tabs on stuff for my sanity, I determined there’s multiple variants of the lab
by redserk 2y ago
There was, bluntly, a mountain of bullshit from many angles. When trying to keep tabs on stuff for my sanity, I determined there’s multiple variants of the lab leak theory:
First, there’s the question of if it was an accident or a deliberate release
Second, (and on top of the first) that it was a lab-engineered strain or research on a naturally occurring strain.
The fringe sites seemed to overwhelmingly adopt the “deliberate release + lab engineered” theory.
On the deliberate release+bio engineered front: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/dean-koontz-book-predicted-coronavirus https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/dean-koontz-book-predi...
On the deliberate-release+bioengineered, but walking back the bioengineering, you have Tom Cotton (granted, the NYT editorial stance in this casts skepticism on Cotton) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/business/media/coronavirus-tom-cotton-china.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/business/media/coronaviru...
There was a reasonable level of reporting stating that the wet market theory was one of a few possibilities, and that a leak was possible but couldn’t be conclusively determined.
My takeaway and bias is that we’ll never conclusively know the root cause. It became a blame game. The effort would be much better spent preparing for the next pandemic.