3 ms·
Why in the world am I getting downvoted for this? For the Claude summary? I also checked the repository manually, and agree with the summary. One of the prime u
by easygenes 2y ago
Why in the world am I getting downvoted for this? For the Claude summary? I also checked the repository manually, and agree with the summary. One of the prime use cases for LLMs is summarization.
- userbinator 2y agoNo one cares. If I wanted to know what an LLM thinks, I'd ask it myself.
- throw-qqqqq 2y agoDidn’t downvote you, but I don’t see any value in posting a copy/paste from Claude. You’re not saving me any meaningful time or doing something I couldn’t. It is not worth a post IMO
- easygenes 2y agoThe main point of the post is to say that it is getting maintained in a fork now, to some degree. It's still a very rudimentary implementation though.
- throw-qqqqq 2y agoThis summary was much better (shorter and to the point) than Claude’s ;)
- lmm 2y agoI feel the same way about people who post a link to/paragraph from Wikipedia, but people don't reflexively downvote those.
- Etheryte 2y agoPlease don't litter HN with LLM generated slop. The value of HN lies in the human discussion, everyone here is capable of asking an LLM about it.
- lproven 2y agoYour comment should not be flagged. It is useful info. I wrote the Reg article and I submitted the link, and I didn't know about the update project. However, I do agree with the other commenters -- do not paste LLM bot output. Your own summary was better.
- i80and 2y agoIt would be extremely cool if this weren't the case, but current LLMs are just very bad at summarization. As evidenced by the slop you posted being a bad summary!
- jillyboel 2y agoMaybe you should ask an LLM?