3 ms·
Well the issue I’ve always found is that privacy is a sliding scale. At the time especially, everyone was after “absolute” privacy - i.e. everything Tor offers.
by MrAlex94 2y ago
Well the issue I’ve always found is that privacy is a sliding scale. At the time especially, everyone was after “absolute” privacy - i.e. everything Tor offers. But people were coming in to use Waterfox with that expectation and it wasn’t meeting it - but communicating how “much” privacy you’re being offered is difficult. I did settle on the current terminology and when people ask in user forums I try and make it clear that it’s a balance of usability and privacy - as much as possible without breaking websites.
Not sure I agree with your understanding wrt Waterfox not being about user control? Always has been and the feature set matches that and that hasn’t changed.
- lolinder 2y agoWell, this is the opening line from that comment: > > Those needs are privacy related and having control over the software you use. > That’s fair enough, but I’ve tried to stay away from branding Waterfox as such to try and avoid issues like this. I guess maybe you were only talking about privacy and not about "having control over the software"?