4 ms·
> In its original meaning, Kanban represented a visual signal. The thing that communicated, well, something. It might have been a need, option, availability, ca
by bob1029 2y ago
> In its original meaning, Kanban represented a visual signal. The thing that communicated, well, something. It might have been a need, option, availability, capacity, request, etc.
> the system is self-explanatory
I've always known of this as an "affordance" - An available & apparent interaction between an object and its user.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Design_of_Everyday_Things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Design_of_Everyday_Things
- ricardobeat 2y agoThere is definitely a connection there, but affordance is a concept specific to interaction design and something having a physically self-evident purpose (handles, buttons, levers, knobs, etc).
- flail 2y agoThat's a great analogy! On the one hand, the context is different. An affordance, as you point out, signals how we should use an item. In a way, it suggests a meaning. A kanban's meaning is typically defined as the process (largely) is known. In the story about Milk Kanban, the index card is self-explanatory, but that's just an extra bit, to make the process more bullet-proof. On the other hand, if we generalize both examples, we land in a place where the design (of things, of processes) should communicate how to act. I either interact with an object or I do my action within a process. BTW: The Design of Everyday Things is another great reading recommendation in this thread.