> How about this one that says Dick Durban is supporting Hamas because he has advocated for the release of Mahmoud Khalil? You made a false statement of fact.

> How about this one that says Dick Durban is supporting Hamas because he has advocated for the release of Mahmoud Khalil? You made a false statement of fact. The tweet never said that. It reads [1]: > 1/ Canary Mission is apolitical. We call out antisemitism on all sides and have never had a vested interest in a political party. However, Senator Dick Durbin is testing our principles like never before. His defense of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Hamas activist, raises serious moral and ethical concerns. It is troubling that one of our great parties is standing behind a Hamas supporter - a group recognized as a terrorist organization—the same group that perpetrated the massacre of October 7, which included the murder, rape and kidnapping of innocent civilians. It clearly says that Khalil is a Hamas supporter, not Dick Durban. There's video of Khalil giving a speech defending Hamas' "armed resistance" [2]. Was this a lack of basic reading comprehension or was that a deliberate lie? [1] https://x.com/canarymission/status/1899487784454508681 https://x.com/canarymission/status/1899487784454508681 [2] https://x.com/canarymission/status/1900204678240928166 https://x.com/canarymission/status/1900204678240928166