> she called the book “defamatory” and alleged that Wynn-Williams had skipped “the industry’s standard fact-checking process.” Why don't we let the community d

> she called the book “defamatory” and alleged that Wynn-Williams had skipped “the industry’s standard fact-checking process.” Why don't we let the community decide, instead of these bureaucratic, free speech-chilling "fact checkers"? If it's good enough for your employer, it should be good enough for you. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251151/meta-fact-checking-mark-zuckerberg-trump https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/nx-s1-5251151/meta-fact-check...