3 ms·
The fact that Meta is aggressively trying to suppress the book just reinforces the point. If it were all "misleading and unfounded," they wouldn't need to fight
by MarceliusK 2y ago
The fact that Meta is aggressively trying to suppress the book just reinforces the point. If it were all "misleading and unfounded," they wouldn't need to fight this hard to bury it.
- 2muchcoffeeman 2y agoThat’s not true. Just look at the current climate. If I repeat lies often enough, people will repeat the same lies and start to believe.
- MarceliusK 2y agoThat's a fair point, repetition can make falsehoods stick. But if the book were full of outright lies, Meta could challenge it with clear evidence rather than legal pressure
- __loam 2y agoOr actually sue.
- luma 2y agoThey repeatedly claim (in the article) that the allegations are "old news". That isn't a denial.
- BLKNSLVR 2y ago"Old news. You should see what we're getting up to under the protective umbrella of this new US regime. We're going to make SO MUCH MONEY!"