4 ms·

Thanks, I edited to assume the best interpretation of the thread. Since I want programming to be inclusive and not have a bad rap publicly, when a peer says “s

by callc 2y ago

Thanks, I edited to assume the best interpretation of the thread. Since I want programming to be inclusive and not have a bad rap publicly, when a peer says “software is better than all other disciplines because of X, Y, Z” I want to convince them otherwise. As a leader and teacher with more grey hair every day, I feel this responsibility

noosphr 2y ago
>As a leader and teacher with more grey hair every day, I feel this responsibility You should probably do less of that since: 1). That's not what any of my posts said. 2). My degree says mathematical physics and not computer science or software engineering. 3). A field where you're tone policed by the tone deaf is the opposite of welcoming and inclusive.
- lovich 2y ago
  Since I’m already in the thread defending you against the other poster, I’ll add here U/callc appears to be reacting to the public perception of how this thread would read externally, you appear to be reacting based on hard logic, which is unpalatable to most of the public. I think you two are talking past each other
  - buzzardbait 2y ago
    > I think you two are talking past each other This is why steelmanning a comment before arguing against it should be a rule.