4 ms·
>Once tech [...] started being a source of wealth and power this happened "in the early 2010s"? I don't think so. Software engineers have no power, and in comp
by rsanek 2y ago
>Once tech [...] started being a source of wealth and power
this happened "in the early 2010s"? I don't think so. Software engineers have no power, and in comparison to finance, quite limited wealth.
- golergka 2y agoOut of 10 richest people of the world, 8 have background in software engineering. Musk, Zuck, Bezos, Ellison, Gates, Page, Brin, Ballmer. Only Buffet and Arnault are exceptions.
- sesm 2y agoThey are not richest people though, they are biggest public shareholders. Real wealth is always well-hidden.
- RUnconcerned 2y agoThe idea that these centibillionaires do not have "real wealth" is beyond absurd
- cafard 2y agoBallmer has a background in working for a software company. Did he ever actually work in software as such?
- psunavy03 2y agoPretty sure he was explicitly brought on by Gates and Allen because he was a non-technical MBA type, and Microsoft had grown to the point where they needed one of those. Sort of tracks with the Welchian bullshit he seems to have supported as CEO.
- lovich 2y agoDespite where they are now, the FAANG founders could sling some amount of code back in the day. I have no doubt they would fail their current interview cycle for engineers if they tried it under a pseudonym, they were considered software engineers when they started their companies and that cohort is now in charge of a double digit percentage of the planets wealth. If you think software engineers have no power and limited wealth compared to finance then I can only imagine you are not a software engineer are are downplaying the amount of power the class has absorbed, or we fundamentally disagree on what a software engineer is
- antonvs 2y ago> software engineers have no power Like that fellow who runs a car company now
- 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 2y agoI don't think he's any good at programming