> But what she discussed doesn’t feel like it’s very substantive beyond what could already be deduced or observed. There is still value in having a primary sou

> But what she discussed doesn’t feel like it’s very substantive beyond what could already be deduced or observed. There is still value in having a primary source for it. Even if it's not news to you. Even on HN when you see an industry open-secret discussed, you'll occasionally have one sub-thread saying "you must be a paranoid conspiracy theorist to even suggest that" while another is the "everyone be knowing that already" sub-thread.