3 ms·
Those other levels of abstraction that you mentioned are deterministic and predictable. I think that's a massive difference and it justifies why one should be m
by Tainnor 2y ago
Those other levels of abstraction that you mentioned are deterministic and predictable. I think that's a massive difference and it justifies why one should be more skeptical towards AI generated code (skeptical doesn't mean "outright dismissing" tbf).
- moffkalast 2y agoDeterministic tab completion generates horseshit half the time too, at the end of the day you have to know what you're doing in either case imo. You can also run an LLM in deterministic mode, but performance is usually worse.
- SleepyMyroslav 2y agoFun fact that we have burned those bridges years ago. Every time big codebase updates it's main optimizing toolchain (compiler/linker) ... there is nothing deterministic and predictable. There is only what has been re-tested and what has not been.
- Nullabillity 2y ago> there is nothing deterministic https://reproducible-builds.org/ https://reproducible-builds.org/ > nothing [...] and predictable Even if the build isn't bit-for-bit-reproducible, any reasonable toolchain will, at least, give predictably equivalent results.