3 ms·
> but the primary business reason game consoles are locked town is to make it harder to play unlicensed commercial games on them. Which is user-hostile. The us
by armada651 2y ago
> but the primary business reason game consoles are locked town is to make it harder to play unlicensed commercial games on them.
Which is user-hostile. The user bought the hardware, so they should be allowed to play whatever they please. Hiding the true cost of the hardware by inflating game prices using licensing fees is monopolistic and an attempt at misleading the consumer.
This is the exact same business model as printer companies reducing the price of printers by inflating the price of printer cartridges and locking down the ability to use third-party ones. It is unbelievable to see people on a site called "Hacker News" defending that business model.
- GeekyBear 2y agoIf there were no way to know in advance if you were buying a gaming appliance or a gaming computer, you might have a point. Some people prefer the simplicity and reliability of an appliance. Some people embrace complexity in the name of having the freedom to do anything (including the freedom to shoot yourself in the foot). The notion that consumers shouldn't be allowed to make decisions that are different than your own... THAT is user hostile.
- armada651 2y ago> The notion that consumers shouldn't be allowed to make decisions that are different than your own... THAT is user hostile. Having the choice is fine, but if there's no way to opt-out then it's not a choice. While far from perfect the Xbox One is a good example of the video game platform that offers an opt-out. And it works, it is one of the most secure gaming consoles on the market and yet it still offers consumers the ability to create their own game software for it.
- GeekyBear 2y agoThere is, in fact, a very simple way to opt out of buying an appliance. Don't buy it.
- armada651 2y agoAt some point that means not buying any modern technology because it's all been locked down. We're already most of the way there.
- GeekyBear 2y agoThere are plenty of other choices. Linux isn't going anywhere. You just don't think people should be allowed to make choices you don't approve of.
- NotPractical 2y ago> You just don't think people should be allowed to make choices you don't approve of. This is what Apple believes, not the person you're replying to?
- pjmlp 2y agoMost of the time people aren't stupid, if they care about where they are spending their money they aren't buying devices on the split of a second and complaining later.
- armada651 2y agoPeople aren't stupid but there is no way to escape this bussiness model unless you go to PC. And the PC is only begrudgingly still an open platform. If something is ever going to successfully replace the PC it will be a walled garden as well. I am appalled by how easily people dismiss the importance of open platforms as insecure and inconvenient. How will people ever learn technical skills if all the technology they own is locked down and glued shut?
- pjmlp 2y agoThey buy Android, Windows, Jolla, Pinephone,.....
- armada651 2y agoHow long before Android and Windows are also walled gardens that are completely locked down? They're certainly moving into that direction. If you buy a device you should be allowed to fully own it. You shouldn't be forced to buy niche inferior alternatives or pay a huge premium.
- pjmlp 2y agoOne more reason to support Linux and BSD OEMs. The Tuxedo, System 76, iXsystems, Pinephone, Jolla, SteamDeck (with native apps, not Proton),... of the world.
- musicale 2y ago> Hiding the true cost of the hardware by inflating game prices using licensing fees is monopolistic and an attempt at misleading the consumer R&D is undertaken with the expectation of future reward, often including licensing fees. However, if we consider component and manufacturing costs, those have always been included in the price of the Nintendo Switch. Even the disc-based PS5 became profitable by that metric after 8 months, during a global pandemic with supply chain shocks.