4 ms·

It just tells me 'content not permitted'. For context, I was attempting to put a cup of hot chocolate into the hands of an anime character.

megadata 2y ago
I think it's definition on what's a "person" is way too broad. I've had similar problems, it's pretty shitty.
- Filligree 2y ago
  It allowed me to do a horse, but- https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/DkQ5SSdT/image.png https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/DkQ5SSdT/image.png Pixelwave generates much better horse-people, in the event I wanted that. Admittedly it doesn't have an edit function; unfortunately the illustrations I want to edit all have people in them. Realistic photos work better, though it still doesn't beat Flux.1-dev: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/ZsouXNpn/image.png https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/ZsouXNpn/image.png
nmfisher 2y ago
I had exactly the same issue, seems like it's practically useless for humanoid illustrations/characters.
amy214 2y ago
I had the same experience on their site, even following the given example! "Show me a horse" -> a brown horse appears. "Make it black" -> now it has black fur. "Make it white" -> I'm sorry, racist content is not permitted, you are a bad person
summerlight 2y ago
Yeah, I'm tired with all those nanny things. Why is Google so obsessed with filtering? They even got all of reputational damages from unnecessary filtering and manipulation, not from unsafe output. I'm pretty sure they've lost 20~30% of potential users due to this crazy level of censorship and it looks like they don't care.
- acters 2y ago
  Local hosting and community support I will always offer more freedom than the rather poor filtering that big tech loves to do. Like why not offer option to pay for copyright content? Seriously, if they can identify it is copyright then they can allow to pay for it, but nope they rather intentionally filter out all of it and end up with useless product that will eventually be phased out.

megadata 2y ago

I think it's definition on what's a "person" is way too broad. I've had similar problems, it's pretty shitty.

Filligree 2y ago
It allowed me to do a horse, but- https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/DkQ5SSdT/image.png https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/DkQ5SSdT/image.png Pixelwave generates much better horse-people, in the event I wanted that. Admittedly it doesn't have an edit function; unfortunately the illustrations I want to edit all have people in them. Realistic photos work better, though it still doesn't beat Flux.1-dev: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/ZsouXNpn/image.png https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/ZsouXNpn/image.png

nmfisher 2y ago

I had exactly the same issue, seems like it's practically useless for humanoid illustrations/characters.

amy214 2y ago

I had the same experience on their site, even following the given example! "Show me a horse" -> a brown horse appears. "Make it black" -> now it has black fur. "Make it white" -> I'm sorry, racist content is not permitted, you are a bad person

summerlight 2y ago

Yeah, I'm tired with all those nanny things. Why is Google so obsessed with filtering? They even got all of reputational damages from unnecessary filtering and manipulation, not from unsafe output. I'm pretty sure they've lost 20~30% of potential users due to this crazy level of censorship and it looks like they don't care.

acters 2y ago
Local hosting and community support I will always offer more freedom than the rather poor filtering that big tech loves to do. Like why not offer option to pay for copyright content? Seriously, if they can identify it is copyright then they can allow to pay for it, but nope they rather intentionally filter out all of it and end up with useless product that will eventually be phased out.