4 ms·
It’s rough for the old timers because as consumers of the web, we’re forced to use SPAs that have objectively worse UX. And sites are built that way now “becaus
by endemic 2y ago
It’s rough for the old timers because as consumers of the web, we’re forced to use SPAs that have objectively worse UX. And sites are built that way now “because it’s how everyone does it.”
- AgentME 2y agoReact doesn't necessarily mean SPAs. It has great support for server-side rendering and that was a big part of why React became more popular than other client-side JS frameworks of the time.
- Matumio 2y agoThe sad thing is, there is no real obstacle to building a fast SPA. It's certainly not harder than to do it all "the old way". But you have to pay attention to performance. If you just implement as many features as you can in as little time as possible, then the outcome will be something like Confluence, I guess, where you wait several seconds to load a documentation page you wanted to just read, not even edit.