> Good for you. > https://quick-lint-js.com/blog/cpp-vs-rust-build-times/ https://quick-lint-js.com/blog/cpp-vs-rust-build-times/ Look you're picking a memory

> Good for you. > https://quick-lint-js.com/blog/cpp-vs-rust-build-times/ https://quick-lint-js.com/blog/cpp-vs-rust-build-times/ Look you're picking a memory unsafe language versus a safe one. Whatever meager gains you save on compilation times (and the link shows the difference is meager if you aren't on a MacOS, which I'm not) will be obliterated by losses in figuring out which UB nasal demon was accidentally released. This is like that argument that dynamic types save time, because you can catch error in tests. But then have to write more tests to compensate, so you lose time overall.