3 ms·
> But they not stated it is <because> of C#'s performance But I just said my point is not about performance at all! It is about the whole package. Performance
by rat9988 2y ago
> But they not stated it is <because> of C#'s performance
But I just said my point is not about performance at all! It is about the whole package. Performance of c# and go are both enough for my usecase, same for java and c obviously. They just told us that they don't think the whole package makes sense, and disowned the AOT compilation.
- nipah 2y agoBut you said: > I was trying ot push .net as our possible language for somehow high performance executables. Seeing this means I'll stop trying to advocate for it. If even this team doesn't believe in it. Which made me naturally think your point was, indeed, about performance. Although as it appears to be, I'm wrong, so it's fair enough.