3 ms·
Heh. That's fair. I wonder what other countries do? Do their agencies trust NIST or they recommend their own and run their programs for algorithms. I am thinki
by rdtsc 2y ago
Heh. That's fair.
I wonder what other countries do? Do their agencies trust NIST or they recommend their own and run their programs for algorithms. I am thinking of say Germany, France, Britain etc.
- Y_Y 2y agoThey have their own agencies responsible, but take note of what NIST says (especially the UK). https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Themen/Unternehmen-und-Organisationen/Informationen-und-Empfehlungen/Quantentechnologien-und-Post-Quanten-Kryptografie/quantentechnologien-und-post-quanten-kryptografie_node.html https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Themen/Unternehmen-und-Organisati... https://cyber.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/document/pqc-transition-in-france.pdf https://cyber.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/document/pqc-trans... https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/whitepaper/next-steps-preparing-for-post-quantum-cryptography https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/whitepaper/next-steps-preparing-for-...
- rdtsc 2y agoThank you. It seems they sort of follow NIST's guidelines mostly: > The NCSC recommends ML-KEM-768 and ML-DSA-65 as providing appropriate levels of security and efficiency for most use cases.