my point is merely that the quality of discussion in the replies to GGP are going to be bad [0][1][2], the relevance is tenuous, and it crowds out content based

my point is merely that the quality of discussion in the replies to GGP are going to be bad [0][1][2], the relevance is tenuous, and it crowds out content based discussion. of course, now my content-based questions are getting downvoted. > reduce institutional competence and increase the likelihood most replies interpreted it the same way I did, likely due to the reference to 'loyalties' & 'trust'. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333834 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333834 [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333698 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333643 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43333643