It doesn't seem correct to dismiss the creativity of Move 37 because real originality is "something more fundamental, like inventing the rules of Go itself" It

It doesn't seem correct to dismiss the creativity of Move 37 because real originality is "something more fundamental, like inventing the rules of Go itself" It would seem more fruitful to simply point out that LLMs aren't all of AI, and that excelling at mimicking human-like text production isn't really doing the work that AlphaGo was attempting. Just because both things might be given as (different) examples of deep reinforcement learning in an AI survey course doesn't mean that we have much reason to believe that the vast investments in LLMs result in AlphaGo like achievements.