Sure it is. You didn't actually say anything substantial, you only described the structure of a hypothetical argument to substitute for having one. The straw p

Sure it is. You didn't actually say anything substantial, you only described the structure of a hypothetical argument to substitute for having one. The straw person you've now added fills a similar function. You're clearly in search of rhetorical positions that lets you keep repeating yourself without taking the risk of participating in rational discourse. How common is it that wealthy people become homeless because they recreationally consume wine? Is the prevalence the same as for other groups?