I think this is mostly due to the more niche nature of the discussion. Many people play games, not too many people (or even devs) know about all the numerous Li

I think this is mostly due to the more niche nature of the discussion. Many people play games, not too many people (or even devs) know about all the numerous Lisp-likes. In relevant communities. I have seen A LOT of arguments in niche communities over what a Lisp should be like. It all started around the introduction of Scheme compilers. Some say a Lisp should have macros, others focus on lists/vectors/hashes, then there's dynamic execution vs compilation, let's not forget about dynamic vs lexical binding; and the big one - Lisp-1 or Lisp-2. I work in a mid-tier tech company with 800 devs. Been here for years, know everyone. There are maybe 3 devs/admins who know what Racket is!