3 ms·
Well they got half of the voters voting against their interest for a guy who by that point had history of incredible moral and legal shortcomings. Of course th
by atoav 2y ago
Well they got half of the voters voting against their interest for a guy who by that point had history of incredible moral and legal shortcomings.
Of course that emboldens greedy billionaires, the little good they did was just a fig leaf. Now they realized that they got the permission to even leave that out.
Ironically "free speech" was kind a talking point on the right for decades, only to crumble the instance they are in power. But to people who know their history it was clear before that "free speech" when used by the far right does only include their choice of what they see as free speech. And if I pointed that out a year ago on this very website, people would have told me I was wrong — hope you're not a government researcher in electrical engineering trying to use the word "bias" then.
Good luck to the US and good luck to the world.