> It takes novel solutions to Right > but that really isn't the bar being mentioned here. Yes, the bar was "novel solutions WITHOUT priori knowledge" So you

> It takes novel solutions to Right > but that really isn't the bar being mentioned here. Yes, the bar was "novel solutions WITHOUT priori knowledge" So you've changed the definition. Please re-read what I disagree with and it's not just the novel part i.e. if I read it all from the Internet and copied it to be successful then that fails this definition.