> 1) You assume all people with questions have no medical training, which is untrue. They, as a rule, have no relevant medical training. I get that you think a

> 1) You assume all people with questions have no medical training, which is untrue. They, as a rule, have no relevant medical training. I get that you think a random RN having a take on vaccines is worth listening to, but they aren’t. > 2) You assume people are too stupid to see when they are having problems and getting answers from their doctors that don't make sense. I assume that people who make stupid analogies because they don’t understand the baseline issues are too stupid to reach relevant conclusions. This isn’t, in any way, shape, or form, like seeing thousands of crashed planes and being told planes don’t crash. It’s seeing crashed planes, deciding that aliens did it, and then refusing to listen to experts when they tell you that that plane was pilot error, this one was an unsecured load, and the one over there hit some birds. Because you saw a YouTube that said it was aliens. You’ve started from an erroneous, bad conclusion, and instead of listening to the people telling you what actually happened, you’ve doubled down and now you’re plugging your fingers in your ears and screaming. That’s why no one cares what you think, or wants to listen to you. It’s because you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about, and you’re not apparently, capable of even having a rational conversation about it. > 3) Telling people who don't trust you that they are too stupid to realize how right you are is going to do nothing to improve the rate of people following your advice or instructions. Nothing is. The only acceptable conclusion to you is being told you’re right. There is no amount of evidence or expertise anyone could ever provide that would lead you to conclude that you were wrong. It’s your personal dogma. Hopefully your kids don’t get polio because you thought reading some Facebook posts made you an unassailable expert.