> As the article notes, public polls started appearing in late September showing Harris ahead, which they never saw internally. Are internal polls just that muc

> As the article notes, public polls started appearing in late September showing Harris ahead, which they never saw internally. Are internal polls just that much better than public ones? Is the media just incentivized to report on the most interesting outcome (a dead heat)? Intentional bias for motivational purposes is a thing - it doesn't make any logical sense, but people want to vote for the winner.