4 ms·
Based just on the details in the report, it seems refusing entry is justified. Or at least not very strange. What I don't understand is, why not just send her
by yibg 2y ago
Based just on the details in the report, it seems refusing entry is justified. Or at least not very strange.
What I don't understand is, why not just send her back home vs detaining her? Maybe someone that's more knowledgeable here can chime in. Is it standard practice to detain someone, especially for an extended period, vs just putting them on the first plane back home?
- newyankee 2y agoThe idea might be to create a clear example that becomes popular and known so that others who might attempt the same will be dissuaded
- londons_explore 2y agoWhen you are at a land border, but neither country on either side of the border will grant you entry, there is no easy 'way out'. She could not fly to the UK directly from that border location. When arrested, she has to go through the proper deportation process - and that might well be very expensive, and she might not have the money to pay. Deportations can easily cost 10x a regular flight cost due to the extra security needed.
- Doxin 2y ago> When arrested, she has to go through the proper deportation process Why? Surely if both the US and the deportee agree that deportation is A-OK then you don't need judges and whatnot involved? Surely having a cop drive her to the airport and make sure she gets on a flight is wildly less work involved for everyone than whatever the fuck is going on now?