> That has to be matched with a strategy of intentional overhiring though, and the damage is being done there No, doesn't have to. Looking at the article, some

> That has to be matched with a strategy of intentional overhiring though, and the damage is being done there No, doesn't have to. Looking at the article, sometimes they had hired the right number of people, but (new?) management decided to let people go because that looked better short term (saved money, higher profits), but was bad long term.