4 ms·

A law only matters when it's enforced. Who the fuck is going to go after me for downloading a few films and songs?

• tracerbulletx 2y ago
  They did this during the napster era.
  • TexanFeller 2y ago
    Indeed, back then there were headlines on Slashdot every day about the RIAA and Metallica band members suing random kids that downloaded music. Probably the only reason they don’t go after people often now is because people mostly use paid streaming instead of piracy, but that will surely change if piracy becomes more widespread again.
    • iczero 2y ago
      Didn't the RIAA completely ruin their reputation (along with the other AAs) by doing that? Now it seems like most people just equate them with a huge pile of lawyers in suits who care not about art.
      • Exoristos 2y ago
        Possibly an upgrade, then, since their early reputation was a huge pile of gangsters in leisure suits.
      • jeffgreco 2y ago
        Who cares? Industry associations are there for building reputations, they’re there to wield collective power.
    • ramenbytes 2y ago
      I don't have it on hand at the moment, but I think I saw something about how the victims of those lawsuits didn't actually end up paying. Might have been related to bankruptcy, and certain things being non-enforceable. Basically the RIAA cottoned on to it not being worth their time and money to ruin their public image for little to no return. Edit: Still can't find it, but did find this EFF article covering a bunch of people who apparently settled for some amount. Haven't followed up on the people who took things to court yet. https://www.eff.org/wp/riaa-v-people-five-years-later https://www.eff.org/wp/riaa-v-people-five-years-later Edit 1: I think it might have just been a high-profile case or two that escaped paying, it seems there were oodles of people who did pay based on the EFF article.