The aforementioned reasons are vague and meaningless in a technical sense, since they could be used to describe any other language as well. There are lots of "s

The aforementioned reasons are vague and meaningless in a technical sense, since they could be used to describe any other language as well. There are lots of "solid technologies" out there, not just Rust. And no, I don't hate Rust, and I don't really care about Rust, or if a project/library is written in Rust or whatever, if it fits the bill, I will use it. If you tell me a real argument why using Rust here is beneficial instead of the vague reasons described here, then I'm happy to listen. If there are no reasons then that is also fine, then it seems like it was used because of a personal choice, experience or other constraints that we don't know. If you are deeply in love with Rust or any other language then thats also fine. And I also get that Rust is great in many situations, like replacing low-level C code, etc.. But stop putting it on a pedestal if there are no real reasons to back that up (in this case).