3 ms·
I didn't interpret the mention of move 37 in the way I think you are here. The author brought it up specifically to highlight that they don't believe move 37 s
by haswell 2y ago
I didn't interpret the mention of move 37 in the way I think you are here.
The author brought it up specifically to highlight that they don't believe move 37 signifies what many people think it does, and that while impressive, it's not general enough to indicate what some people seem to believe it indicates.
In essence, I think they said the same thing you are using different words.
- janalsncm 2y agoI don’t disagree with the author, I just think their argument isn’t as strong as it could be. Excelling in a constrained decision space like go is fundamentally less difficult than doing the same in the real world. It’s a categorical difference that the author didn’t mention. I’m also not even convinced move 37 was properly explained as a “straight A student” behavior. AlphaGo did bootstrap by studying human games but it also learned more fundamental value functions via self play.