3 ms·
And the latest AMD cards for reference? Also, some DeepSeek models would be cool.
by DrNosferatu 2y ago
And the latest AMD cards for reference?
Also, some DeepSeek models would be cool.
- magicalhippo 2y agoComing I hope, though I wouldn't have huge expectations. He already did the general compute benchmark of the two 9070 cards here[1], and between poorly optimized drivers and GDDR6's lower memory bandwidth, I wouldn't expect any great scores. In terms of memory bandwidth they're between a 4070 and a 4070 Ti SUPER, and given that LLMs are very memory-bandwidth constrained as I mentioned in another comment, at best you'd expect the LLM score to end up between the 4070 and the 4070 Ti SUPER. [1]: https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-radeon-rx9070-linux-compute https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-radeon-rx9070-linux-comp...
- Joel_Mckay 2y agoThe 9070 cards are hard to find, and inflated 30% above MSRP right now. Apparently the supply of fuse-crippled 9070 cards was just used to up-sell 9070 XT (easier to find.) Have a look at the GamersNexus YT rant about it... They make a fair argument in that price range an older model used RTX nvidia card may be a better value. Depends on your use-case, as rtx 5090 nvidia AI frame interpolation is dog crap hype for CGI or CUDA accelerated ML libraries. Personally, I would go with the rtx 4090 or even an rtx 3090 with 24G vram for ML and CGI workstation, as CUDA+Optix has better software support. For just gaming, the 9070 XT is a better deal when the MSRP is within range. Depends how willing you are to get ripped off by scalper prices right now. lol =3