4 ms·
> it doesn’t seem controversial to say if your media diet is bad your vote is misinformed. This is an instance of the naturalistic fallacy [1] and it contradic
by flanked-evergl 2y ago
> it doesn’t seem controversial to say if your media diet is bad your vote is misinformed.
This is an instance of the naturalistic fallacy [1] and it contradicts your very first sentence.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
- latexr 2y agoIt is neither a fallacy nor a contradiction, you completely misunderstood the point. What I am saying is precisely that you can defined those however you see fit and your definitions don’t even need to match the other person’s for a consensus. To pull it to an extreme of simplicity, we can all agree that good things are good and bad things are bad without having to agree on which specific things are which.