> Nerds trying to be hyper efficient in the wrong ways. > Simpler and closer to standards is always always better. I don’t entirely disagree, but if it’s fewe

> Nerds trying to be hyper efficient in the wrong ways. > Simpler and closer to standards is always always better. I don’t entirely disagree, but if it’s fewer migrations between stuff and less churn that you’re after, at that point you might either: A) go in the direction of something like HTMX for suitable problems (or tbh most SSR approaches without the complexity of neither SPAs nor hydration) B) alternatively find the most milquetoast yet batteries included option out there, like Angular (and hope that something like AngularJS doesn’t happen)