4 ms·
You mean we should have no free speech or elections to ensure democracy?
by contravariant 2y ago
You mean we should have no free speech or elections to ensure democracy?
- otabdeveloper4 2y agoThat would be the safest way if we don't want Trump or Putin propaganda to win.
- Existing4190 2y agoI see what you did there.
- wave-function 2y agoSure — as my friend likes to say, "Democracy is the rule of the democrats". Recent developments have proven him right.
- Cthulhu_ 2y agoIt's the paradox of tolerance or whatever, we're seeing that free speech and open elections have allowed the intolerant / autocrats to take over and take away those liberties, which implies that in order to have stopped them, they shouldn't have had those rights. One point of concern is that the idea of free speech has been used by foreign influences to change the opinions of people over the years. Anyway, counterpoint, unless there was voter fraud etc, democracy allows people to vote against democracy, so if that is the will of the majority, so it goes. Of course, one could argue it wasn't the will of the majority but of a vocal minority, which is the other problem with democracy.
- miroljub 2y agoMany people in the "Western Civilization" seem to agree with that stance. Sad but true.