3 ms·
> there's no reason to suspect the possible illiberal mass arrests of political opponents in the future No reason, from the man who was already threatening tar
by Terr_ 2y ago
> there's no reason to suspect the possible illiberal mass arrests of political opponents in the future
No reason, from the man who was already threatening targeted illegal arrest of political opponents?
No reason, from the man who keeps making "jokes" about being president for life?
No reason, from the man who sent lawyers to the supreme Court to argue that he could order the military to assassinate his rivals and it wouldn't be a crime?
No reason, from the man who said he needed generals more like Hitler's?
No reason, from the man who promised the largest deportations in American history?
No reason, from a man who argued his election loss justified "the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution"?
... What needs to exist for you to be suspicious?
- OgsyedIE 2y ago/s was apparently necessary, after all.
- Terr_ 2y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law The year is 2025, and Trump has been re-elected. Unfortunately, we are far past the critical threshold of apologists who spout such things non-sarcastically. (Which I'd caution isn't really the same as "sincerely.")
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Terr_ 2y agoUpdate: Sorry for the [dead]. Wasn't me.