3 ms·
The people providing science funding ought to be interested in their money being spent on science. If the methods of a study are not described in sufficient det
by snackbroken 2y ago
The people providing science funding ought to be interested in their money being spent on science. If the methods of a study are not described in sufficient detail as to enable replication, the study is simply not science. Of course, doing science requires more diligence than doing pseudoscience. That's kind of the point.
- lazide 2y agoAnd I think that is really the crux. I don’t see it getting better for awhile either. We need to get a lot more cynicism in society to counteract the fraud.
- me-vs-cat 2y agoHow many of the people providing the funding are interested in science, and how many simply want an outcome which furthers their ends?