4 ms·
> I expect a first response would be a single city, with warnings to evacuate. A show of what's next. And when a US city is taken out in response? Do you keep
by danenania 2y ago
> I expect a first response would be a single city, with warnings to evacuate. A show of what's next.
And when a US city is taken out in response? Do you keep going? Over a country that ultimately has very little impact on the US?
Your premise is basically that US military leaders are irrational to the point of insanity.
- b112 2y agoAt that point, as I stipulated "The West", multiple countries would be boots on ground, invading Russia. If Russia gave an ultimatum to nuke at that point, and was serious, it would make perfect sense to nuke a city of theirs first. This isn't a game you win by backing off. There is no safety in that move. Understand, the claim that the Ukraine is "Russian" is an absurd bluff. No one truly believes that, not Putin certainly. There are a dozen other countries in that region that Putin could make the same bluff about. By allowing this bluff to continue for this long, matters have only gotten worse. We allowed 2014 to happen. Now, we're here. It won't stop a a peace agreement, or at Ukraine in whole. The insanity is Russian. And you don't leave a rambling, insane man with a gun outside your house, shooting randomly at houses, because they're not quite at your doorstep yet.