4 ms·
So “repeal and replace” with no plan for the “replace”. Sounds familiar. Reforming the government to be more efficient is great. Simply killing off large swath
by rco8786 2y ago
So “repeal and replace” with no plan for the “replace”. Sounds familiar.
Reforming the government to be more efficient is great. Simply killing off large swaths of programs that real people benefit from and rely on with no plan for those people simply because it wasn’t efficient enough is bad governance and just plain cruel.
Leaving a “vacuum” behind you and expecting someone else to come clean up after your mess is not good governance. The people that will eventually do the work to fill that vacuum are the heroes here, and I don’t think anyone on either side of the aisle thinks it’ll be the current administration who fills said vacuum.