> The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. I can't see any way the "speed" c

> The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. I can't see any way the "speed" could ever be the next item in the series "velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap", could you explain how it could be? It's an extremely common sequence so it should be something a LLM can get right easily. Even the auto complete in a Google search gives the correct answer. > Foes anyone really expect better than what your images show which in my opinion is pretty damn good. Do you really expect to write a program just mindlessly hitting tab all day long? The other examples (and most of my other tests) show variables and types being invented that don't exist anywhere in the code base, how is that good? In both of these cases the LLM is strictly worse than my regular auto-complete that gives the correct result. I fail to see how a downgrade from that can be considered good.