3 ms·

The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. In any case, even if you dont like

The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. In any case, even if you dont like speed, the actual code is spot on. Foes anyone really expect better than what your images show which in my opinion is pretty damn good. Do you really expect to write a program just mindlessly hitting tab all day long?

LiamPowell 2y ago
> The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. I can't see any way the "speed" could ever be the next item in the series "velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap", could you explain how it could be? It's an extremely common sequence so it should be something a LLM can get right easily. Even the auto complete in a Google search gives the correct answer. > Foes anyone really expect better than what your images show which in my opinion is pretty damn good. Do you really expect to write a program just mindlessly hitting tab all day long? The other examples (and most of my other tests) show variables and types being invented that don't exist anywhere in the code base, how is that good? In both of these cases the LLM is strictly worse than my regular auto-complete that gives the correct result. I fail to see how a downgrade from that can be considered good.
- uberman 2y ago
  You cant see any connection between speed and velocity or acceleration? Speed and velocity are literally synonyms at least in the common use and certainly as close to velocity as acceleration. But hey noone is forcing you to use this tool right so just turn it off I guess.
zahlman 2y ago
Even without noticing the pattern (the names are nth derviatives of a vector displacement with respect to time), "speed" makes no sense to include in a sequence that already includes "velocity".

LiamPowell 2y ago

> The completion seems good to me. In fact suggesting "speed" as a parameter seems unexpectedly good rather than nonsensical. I can't see any way the "speed" could ever be the next item in the series "velocity, acceleration, jerk, snap", could you explain how it could be? It's an extremely common sequence so it should be something a LLM can get right easily. Even the auto complete in a Google search gives the correct answer. > Foes anyone really expect better than what your images show which in my opinion is pretty damn good. Do you really expect to write a program just mindlessly hitting tab all day long? The other examples (and most of my other tests) show variables and types being invented that don't exist anywhere in the code base, how is that good? In both of these cases the LLM is strictly worse than my regular auto-complete that gives the correct result. I fail to see how a downgrade from that can be considered good.

uberman 2y ago
You cant see any connection between speed and velocity or acceleration? Speed and velocity are literally synonyms at least in the common use and certainly as close to velocity as acceleration. But hey noone is forcing you to use this tool right so just turn it off I guess.

zahlman 2y ago

Even without noticing the pattern (the names are nth derviatives of a vector displacement with respect to time), "speed" makes no sense to include in a sequence that already includes "velocity".